Use Cases
01
Utilities transitioning from OMS to MIOTY with minimal field changes
02
Dense smart‑building deployments needing high interference robustness
03
Industrial telemetry in noisy RF environments
Wireless M‑Bus → MIOTY Bridge (EMB‑200)
OMS Wireless M‑Bus to MIOTY TS‑UNB bridge with ultra‑robust LPWAN performance
5G/4G Backhaul
Secure · Rugged
Industry Grade
Key feaures
-
Converts OMS W‑M‑Bus frames into MIOTY telegrams with payload mapping
-
Fragmentation/interleaving for interference resilience
-
Edge normalization (DLMS COSEM profile export optional)
-
5G/LTE backhaul with MQTT/HTTPS to cloud HES/DCS
-
Configurable filtering, aggregation, store‑and‑forward buffering
-
Strong crypto: AES‑128/256, Secure Boot, signed OTA
.png)
Technical Specifications
Wireless M‑Bus
EN 13757‑4 (OMS) Modes T/C/S/N; 868/915 MHz
MIOTY
TS‑UNB (ETSI TS 103 357‑1/‑2); +20 dBm
Backhaul
5G NR SA/NSA; LTE Cat‑4/Cat‑M1; Dual SIM
I/O
2× Ethernet (1× PoE), 1× RS‑485, USB; GNSS input
Compute
Quad‑core ARM @ 1.2 GHz; 1 GB RAM; 8 GB eMMC
Enclosure
IP67, 160×110×45 mm; UV‑stable; wall/pole mount
Power
9–36 V DC or PoE; 3–5 W typ
Security
TLS 1.3, TPM 2.0 (opt), VPN
Experimental results (Internal lab)
Co-Channel Interference Test
MIOTY reception with 3 interfering narrowband carriers at −85 dBm each.
Desired RSSI (dBm) | Success Rate (%) |
|---|---|
-120 | 96.9% |
-110 | 98.6% |
-100 | 99.2% |
C-Channel Interference Test
Bridge Latency
Time from W‑M‑Bus packet capture to MIOTY telegram enqueued.
Mode | Median (ms) | P95 (ms) |
|---|---|---|
Edge+Normalize | 55 | 98 |
Edge‑only | 38 | 72 |
Energy Profile
Average power under 15‑min reporting interval; backhaul idle.
State | Power (W) |
|---|---|
Backhaul TX peak | 4.6 |
Bridge Active | 3.1 |
Idle | 2.0 |
Backhaul Resilience
Store‑and‑forward buffer performance during 30‑min outage.
Buffered Frames | Data Loss | Auto-Recovery (s) |
|---|---|---|
45,000 | 0% | 11.7 |
-40°C…+70°C
Operating Temp
IP67
Enclosure Rating
Dual SIM
5G/4G Failover